The Science of Morality
No one speaks of morality anymore. It’s not sexy.
Morality – the extent to which an action is right or wrong.
A working definition of morality indicates what is a “right” or “wrong” way to behave.
Humans experience right and wrong based on the consequences of their actions. When life comes with responsibilities, it makes moral claims on each of us. Moral claims rise to a higher level than the claims of law. Under morality, there are things we must do and things we must not do. Whether these actions are “good” or “bad” is the subject of ethics. Ethics comes from society and the beliefs and values of the collective.
Values are the privileges of a democracy, whereas morals are the rights of a democratic republic.
The fact is that good people can do bad things. People can act in their own self-interest and at the expense of others. If we lose our morals, we are left with values.
The focus on what to wear, how to style your hair, what school to send your kids to, what to drink, what to eat, how to identify yourself— these are values.
Values are judgments and opinions about what is important in life. Everyone has an opinion. Values are sexy!
Building the Hive Mind
A focus on “shared values” keeps people in the zone of groupthink where they conform to a norm, or stand out as the odd duck. By your actions, you are known.
Becoming “average” coalesces everyone from the fringe to the center because being on the fringe is not sexy. With full focus on value judgments and opinions, people may forget morals. But they will be safe.
Creating the path to the center is the job of Social Engineers. The goal is to homogenize the population into a Hive Mind and bring about a state where a foundation of human rights no longer exists. To accomplish this, Social Engineers attempt to create The Great Reset. In this new Age, people will accept less to be more because by 2030 your life savings will not be enough to sustain you. When everything is shared, you will be sustained by the collective.
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. – Edward Bernays, Propaganda, 1928
The tone of The Great Reset is summarized by Danish MP Ida Auken in her 2016 essay, also published by promoters at the Summit of the WEF in Davos Switzerland. The Great Reset is marketed and sold as a privileged world of “equality” and “safety” without privacy, because who needs that in a hive?
In a value-based structure, it is the Queen Bee who directs her subjects. The result is the appearance of equality while actually creating more division among subjects with less power, known as drones.
Social experiments have shown how large groups of people can be influenced as one mind: 1) the 2017 Pussyhat march attracted large numbers of women who marched together wearing pink hats that mocked their sexual organs atop their heads, 2) “White Privilege,” or reverse racism, blamed white people for racism while doing nothing to correct it, 3) “Black Lives Matter” further segregated Black people from all people, 4) “Gender Bending” subdivides male and female genders into 50+ identities, while diagnosing it as a condition known as Gender Dysphoria, and 5) “unvaccinated people” who are asymptomatic are weaponized as a danger to the vaccinated.
Each group, whether white-privilege, Black Lives Matter, Gender Identity, or Unvaccinated, are subdivisions of one humanity. Yet, each time a new narrative is engineered, it creates a new class of people, while distracting from the underlying agenda to further divide and conquer. The new groups serve the Queen as she commands even if they never actually see her. After a season, the message of the movement disappears and is never spoken of again. But the seed of the program remains to be watered with each new movement.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. – Edward Bernays, Propaganda, 1928
Values coalesce people to give up their unique “l” identity to a super organism where everyone has the same thoughts, same emotions, and same opinions. They belong to a privileged class. No one thinks to ask if the actions that caused the subdivisions are ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’ Those who think to ask are censored or attacked for being different.
Drones choose an external “cause” to do the thinking for them. Thus, nothing changes internally. There is no moral yardstick for rights or freedom. The only thing that changes is where the Queen directs you next.
Where did this diversion from morals to values begin?
Losing Morality to Consensus
The sciences of Evolutionary Science, Behavioral Science, Neuroscience, Political Science have joined together with Artificial Intelligence to hatch Scientism, the religion of Science that replaces morals and ethics to advance Evolutionary Biology to a new level. The result? The absence of leadership.
A Melbourne-led team has for the first time shown that 800,000 brain cells living in a dish—DishBrain—can perform goal-directed tasks—in this case, the simple tennis-like computer game, Pong. The researchers’ experiments provide evidence that brain cells in a dish can exhibit inherent intelligence, modifying their behavior over time. – Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, Oct 2020
Scientism is Consensus science:
Consensus: “The process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, and policies in search of something in which no one believes, but to which no one objects; the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved, merely because you cannot get agreement on the way ahead. – Margaret Thatcher, UK Prime Minister
Charles Darwin used Evolutionary Science to make humans believe they descended from bacteria. Yet, this assumption cannot be demonstrated in Nature. If evolution was happening as you read this, you should be able to look outside your window and see the various stages of bacteria advancing into the human form. Thousands of published studies would have documented shared genes between the species.
The moral? Nature does not function under Darwin’s assumptions.
According to the laws of Nature, each species is distinct, separated by a “species barrier.” This barrier protects the integrity of a particular species so that it has a good chance of surviving to produce more of its own kind. This way a zebra doesn’t find a chicken attractive and change its stripes. If a horse mates with a donkey, they produce an infertile mule. The only way to take on a disease from another species is to inject a patented product.
For instance, Swine Flu (H1N1) is listed as a type of infection. It’s called swine flu because it resembles a respiratory infection that pigs can get in crowded conditions, not because humans catch it from pigs. If an infection is a newsworthy, it usually has a viral patent associated with it: ZIKA, EBOLA, SARS, Coronavirus.
Morals represent truth and virtue, whereas science is based on assumptions and conclusions. When we believe science as truth we lose integrity as individuals because we take on other people’s assumptions. We become stiff and rigid in our thinking, and fanatical in our actions. When the unique nature of each individual is melded into a consensus mind, humans become a consensus species.
An August 2017 study was published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases to evaluate the difference between artificial immunity via vaccination, and natural immunity via natural infection:
Donated blood was separated into three groups – those who were born before the vaccine was available, those who were born during a time when only one shot was given, and those who were born during a time in which 2 shots were given. Results were dramatic.
The majority of antibodies were observed in the early group, the unvaccinated, who had three more times the antibodies in their blood than those that had received…one shot, and 8 times more than those that had received 2 shots.
The evidence showed natural immunity is sabotaged by artificial interventions. If science had morals, it would call artificial immunity “ineffective and dangerous” to human biological integrity and evolution.
Alas, science derives conclusions, not morals.
Under the structure of science, there is no room for a moral discussion of whether vaccination is good or bad, or right of wrong, for the human species or for any species. The nature of Science is to create endless debate. Thus, when people are mired in debating the science, they are bogged down in value judgments, while morals are lost in the wind. Science as a tool to divide and conquer has done its job.
For those more interested in politics, it works the same way.
Whatever of social importance is done to-day, whether in politics, finance, manufacture, agriculture, charity, education, or other fields, must be done with the help of propaganda. Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government. Edward Bernays, Propaganda, 1928
Consensus drives “equality of outcome” which describes fair competition for important jobs and positions so that contenders have equal chances to win such positions. This is illustrated in the novel Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, when the Dodo tells Alice that “everybody has won and all must have prizes.” More commonly, equality of outcome is seen in Trans Athletics where biological men who identify as women dominate women’s sports.
The problem with this idea? Like evolution, the assumption of equal outcomes does not exist in the Natural world. In a world of individuals, some people are more equal than others. The moral?
There is no moral in politics.