Over 260 Covid-19 Tests Formerly Approved for Emergency Use Have Been Recalled by FDA Due to Serious Problems or Company Failing to Providing Proper Documentation to Meet Testing Minimum Standards – FDA FAQs


Just when you thought you understood science, science changes the rules.


Yesterday, viruses had been responsible for infectious disease. The virus was known as a ‘contagion’. Today, The American Cancer Society says that viruses cause cancer.


In the Covidian Age, anything goes.


Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/openclipart-vectors-30363/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=156870">OpenClipart-Vectors</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=156870">Pixabay</a>So blame it all on a virus!  A virus is too small to notice, even with a microscope. And why would anyone question the wisdom of the experts, the only ones who claim to see these viruses?


Scientists claim that both DNA and RNA viruses have been shown to be capable of causing cancer in humans.


What virus? Where?


Previously, a virus could not survive outside a cell.


That’s because a virus is a particle, not an organism. It must use a cell’s organelles to function and survive.


If a virus cannot escape a living cell alive, then how does a virus spread disease? How does a virus cause cancer?


A wild virus would first need to be isolated and identified.


But that only happens in theory.


What is a Virus?


According to scientific consensus, a virus is an obligate intracellular pathogen. That means a virus is obligated to live forever within the confines of a cell membrane, its prison cell.


Viruses do not have enzymes required to reproduce. They do not have reproductive organs or a nervous system. They do not have a brain or a heart. Only inside a cell are viruses capable of replicating, which can eventually kill the cell. Then, they, too, die. Thus, a virus is completely dependent on the cell’s envelope for its survival.


Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/openclipart-vectors-30363/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=156869">OpenClipart-Vectors</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=156869">Pixabay</a>There is another way to appreciate the virus, in a positive light, as an exosome.


Exosomes are “naturally‐occurring particles.” They arise, organically, within cells for self-cleaning and communication.


According to a 2017 article in the journal Cell Adhesion and Migration, exosomes are “recognized as important mediators for cell-to-cell communication in many physiological and pathological situations, including immune response, cancer progression and metastasis, neuronal communication, cardiovascular diseases and progression of neurodegenerative diseases.”


No matter what you call them, viruses or exosomes, they cannot be isolated due to contamination issues.


In the paper titled, Is Complete Purification/Isolation of a “Virus” Even Possible?, the medical literature summarizes the challenges of purification and isolation:


  • In order to claim a particular particle is a “virus” and can cause the symptoms of disease associated with it, logic dictates that it must be completely separated from all other potential variables/factors in order to prove that particular particle is indeed the cause of disease. This is the only logical way to show that no other particles in the sample could have been the cause of disease and in the case of genomics, that the DNA/RNA sequences belongs to only that particular particle which is believed to be a “virus.”
  • Viruses” are considered exosomes in every sense of the word as they are identical in size, shape, and appearance.
  • Exosome isolation remains a challenge for biomedical research. There is still no consensus over which purification technique produces the best results.
  • There is no methodology providing enough robustness regarding purification yield, selectivity, and reproducibility.
  • Contamination from other vesicles, molecules or particles that overlap is expected.
  • The main difference is that exosome research regularly attempts purification using one or multiple methods whereas Virology does not…. the methods discussed all suffer from contamination from other particles.


This begs the question: Did Coronavirus ever exist?


No Proof Of Coronavirus


Image by Tumisu from PixabayIn 2020, while the media spread rumor and innuendo about a viral threat killing scores of people in every part of the world, a July 2021 CDC documents sailed under the radar.


The CDC admitted that Coronavirus has not been isolated.  See page 41. This assertion has not been updated to suggest otherwise.


Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.


Before anyone could question the validity of the virus, the PCR test kits were rolled out to offer proof of the supposed “Coronavirus.” Meanwhile, the inventor of the PCR test in 1983, Kary Mullis, claimed that the PCR test is NOT to be used as a diagnostic test.


Does the PCR test identify a virus that does not exist?


Could the PCR test have been used to exaggerate COVID case numbers?


Read on…


The False Flag Tests


Millions Covid-19Tests Recalled for Bacterial and other contamination issues – unite4truth.com


Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/gdj-1086657/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5018466">Gordon Johnson</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5018466">Pixabay</a>In April of 2020, the CDC knew the COVID Pandemic was the product of an inappropriate test.


On December 31, 2021, The CDC admitted the PCR test cannot differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.


After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.


According to an April 2021 report, the state of New York uses the Wadsworth antibody test to develop a Baseline Standard for Measurement of Covid-19 infection rates.


However, Wadsworth antibody testing documentation states the company did not have SARS-CoV2 antibody material to develop baseline standards for development of SARS-CoV2 antibody tests, so instead utilized biotin-streptavidin technology.


The FDA issued a warning in 2017 flagging false positive test results which covers the biotin-streptavidin technology utilized in New York State. However, this warning is not included on public information sheets by the state. Other problems?


  • Biotin is flagged for false positive error for Wadsworth Covid-19 Antibody tests, 70% of the population take a multi-vitamin, many with a B7 vitamin (Biotin) component in the supplement and biotin naturally occurs in food.
  • test detects multiple other infectious organisms, test is non specific to SARS-CoV2.
  • test has a specificity rate that will create up to 100% false positives when used in the very populations employed most often to study, low incident rate populations and people with suspected. respiratory infections.
  • There is no standard reference SARS-CoV2 antigen material available; accordingly, absolute analytical sensitivity cannot be calculated.
  • Wadsworth antibody testing reveals testing protocols that will generate up to 100% false positives test results due to protocol recommendations and test method errors.


According to a March 2021 United4Truth article, the CDC Emergency Use guidelines state specifically that a positive test result with RT PCR Emergency Use only testing does not equate to being either symptomatic or contagious due to SARS-CoV2:


We assert these issues have created serious and potential individual and public health harm, and create legal liability issues for health professionals charged with implementing protocols that go against the evidence based standards required for safe, legal, and ethical practice. – CDC

Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/mvezokaramchandhay-21170102/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=6787383">Mvezo Karamchand Hay</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=6787383">Pixabay</a>

Further, there are the problems and errors associated with PCR amplification.  RT PCR tests work by detecting the presence of a shortened strand of RNA through amplification of testing sample material.


Every cycle that the test material is run through decreases the amount of available material, so when run through too many cycles, the material detected is nothing more than non-infectious dead matter.


Over 260 Covid-19 Tests formerly approved for Emergency Use have been Recalled by FDA Due to Serious Problems. Further, companies failed to provide proper documentation to meet testing minimum standards. In essence, millions of Covid-19Tests have been recalled for bacterial and other contamination issues.


Such is the state of ‘science’ today.


Lab Born Cancer Virus


What remains unspoken is that the SARS-CoV2 virus was created in a lab and patented for profit.


However, written proof is found in the July 2015, a U.S. patent for “an attenuated coronavirus” (SARS-CoV2) was filed, and subsequently granted in November 2018 to the CDC. showing that the spiked suspension “isolates” were created in a lab for use in vaccines.


How is the virus known as SARS-CoV2 able to be identified by a PCR test?


The synthetic SARS-CoV2 virus contains an isolate material inserted into it using CRISPR technology. This isolate material is called A549 cells.


The A549 cells are adeno-carcinomic-human-alveolar-basal-epithelial-cells, and constitute a cancer cell line that was first developed in 1972 by D. J. Giard, et al. through the removal and culturing of cancerous lung tissue in the explanted tumor of a 58-year-old caucasian male. The A549 cells are spliced into the host genome using CRISPR technique.


…we infected the GeCKOv2 pool of A549ACE2 cells with SARS-CoV-2 virus (Isolate USA-WA1/2020 NR-52281) at either a high (0.3) or a low (0.01) MOI. We verified that SARS-CoV-2 infects A549ACE2 cells by staining for the nucleocapsid (N) protein at 24 h post-infection (Figure 1B), and at day 6 post-infection, we measured cell survival for both the high and low MOI conditions (Figure 1C)…. Next, we extracted genomic DNA, and via amplicon sequencing…..as expected given that SARS-CoV-2 rapidly kills A549ACE2 cells without CRISPR perturbations


A Canadian Naturopathic doctor found that the PCR test protocol developed by the World Heath Organization to detect COVID-19 actually tests for chromosome 8, which is present in all humans.


In other words, the PCR test identifies only human DNA, not viral particles.


Now you know why the test gives 80% false-positive results for COVID-19 and why so many people tested positive are described as asymptomatic. They don’t have any COVID-19. They have what everyone has, chromosome 8. – Amandha Dawn Vollmer ND, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto

Cancer, The Emerging Pandemic


What they don’t want you to know is that there is no direct evidence pathogenic viruses exist and cause disease in humans. ….. The Covid-19 Fraud and war on humanity has been an example of how far the lie can be pushed. Once the Covid-19 show ends, there will be another virus waiting in the wings, unless the people can see, the emperor has NO clothes……..” – Dr. Sam Bailey 

Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/openclipart-vectors-30363/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1296236">OpenClipart-Vectors</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1296236">Pixabay</a>

Cancer centers are noticing a clear trend upward in cancer rates. Worldwide, cancer rates are rising in younger populations.


How do cancer rates rise in a technologically-advanced medical landscape? Why is antibiotic resistance rising if western medicine is advancing? Why do medical experts avoid these questions?


In 2021, Idaho doctor, Ryan Cole, MD observed a 20-fold increase in endometrial cancer in his practice since the mRNA vaccine roll-out. He claims humans are modifying the immune cells that keep cancer in check. In the down regulating of the immune system he sees a dramatic drop in killer T-cells that results in an uptick in conditions of low immune status: Herpes, melanomas, cervical lesions, Shingles, Mononucleosis, autoimmune disease, and solid tumor cancers.


A September, 2022 study in the journal Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology showed that the incidence of ‘early onset cancers,’ in adults under 50 years old has been increasing in the U.S. and many parts of the world since the 1990s. What has changed?


  1. PCR testing is the gateway test for a false positive diagnosis of viral infections.
  2. Synthetic mRNA (HPV) and SARS-CoV2 vaccines have been deployed into the human genome worldwide.
  3. SARS-CoV2 envelope contains a human cancer sequence (A549 cells).
  4. SARS-CoV2 research is called Gain of Function (GoF), which makes particles more deadly.


Think Frankenstein.


Synthetic Immunity


The gene-encoded or mRNA, vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replication of the already synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm the the recombinant vaccine does. The vaccine recipient has no defense agains the bloodstream entry. – Major Joseph Murphy Letter to DoD

Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay

The first generation mRNA vaccines encode the DNA to create a foreign “spike protein” in the body. This technology induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses.


A June 2022 study in the journal Virology showed that immunity declined in vaccinated people after two doses. The published conclusion? “As a safety measure, further booster vaccinations should be discontinued.”


Without a normal immune response, there is no antibody response and no killer T cell activation. Cells can grow of control, into cancers [See Immunity Malfunction].


Enter: The 2nd generation monoclonal antibodies that target synthetic spike proteins, and replace the innate immune system with a synthetic one.


Monoclonal antibodies may be required for people who cannot develop or maintain an adequate immune response after vaccination.  – Covid19 Prevention Network


As with EUA vaccines, the new monoclonal antibody drugs are not FDA-approved. And there are dozens of patented monoclonal antibody technologies soon to be released.


The WHO recommends two new second generation monoclonal antibody drugs, for those who are at high risk of hospitalization (baricitinib & sotrovimab). Warnings for these drugs include cancer, blood clots, and death.  Some of these drugs are being paired with Remdesivir, a known cause of adverse events.


Another 2nd Gen COVID drug, REGEN-COV was previously withdrawn as a treatment for patients with advanced cervical cancer. Still others, such as COVAX and RELCoVax are injectable gene-therapy promoted by media doctors who push a 4-pronged WHO strategy. RelCoVax introduces Aluminum (neurotoxin) directly into human cells.


Think Gulf War Illness.


Rewrite the Narrative


Image by StockSnap from PixabayWith the spread of Big Tech also comes the spread of misinformation, in big ways. The new narratives seek to create a Medical Technological Age of ‘tele-everything’. Speech generators such as Voicebox suggest Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) will edit messages similar to how CRISPR edits genomes.


Experts Say the ‘New Normal’ in 2025 Will Be Far More Tech-Driven, Presenting More Big Challenges.’


Many respondents said their deepest worry is over the seemingly unstoppable manipulation of public perception, emotion and action via online disinformation – lies and hate speech deliberately weaponized in order to propagate destructive biases and fears. They worry about significant damage to social stability and cohesion and the reduced likelihood of rational deliberation and evidence-based policymaking.


The FDA and WHO are betting you will continue to allow new and untested drugs into your body for new and unproven viruses.


Are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) really Centers for Disease Creation and Promotion?


The rules have changed. There are no saviors or Protectors. The protector is the original, innate immune system, a birth right.


It’s time for humanity to step up and reclaim responsibility for its organic origins. It’s time to rewrite the narrative before inorganic Artificial Intelligence, and gene therapy, does it for us.


Related Articles: